Pay Escort Lists
These sites have total or primary
focus is on providing visitors with links to escorts. The escort
must pay to be listed on these sites. Some of them also require
the visitors to obtain membership (they pay as well), or must go
through an AVS (which they have had to purchase) to view the escort.
With the plethora of quality free list sites available, Eros Rising
questions the value of spending money on these sites. though obviously
a number of escorts do feel they are worthwhile since they continue
to pay for listings.Once again these are all sites with international
coverage, not just a particular region.
Adonis Escorts
Very small site. Has clearly distinguished sections for straight female,
bisexual, and gay male escorts. Very, very tiny site and the current
layout is good but will NOT support much growth before it comes frustrating.
Will need redesign then.
Connect 2 Men
New as of summer 2005. Appears to have a decent layout though does
take a bit of time to get used to (which is a negative for impatient
potential clients). Offers 30 day free trial.
Gay Escorts Site is in six languages: Deutsche, English, Español,
Francais, Italiano, and Português. Excellent design and superb layout.
New in 2002 but showed early fast growth since as they took a lot
of initiative in listing escorts. Too early in its life to rate
value of site.
Gay Take Out
New as of Summer 2005 with very few listings. Heavy emphasis on
US with the rest of the world decidedly subjigated (and we can't
find Canada anywhere!). Classy look but an overly simplistic design.
Global
Escorts Based in Australia (where escorting is a licensed profession)
this site is very up-front about what it's all about. Classy, sharp,
and easy to use. There are sections for National (Australian)
escorts, and International (the rest of the world).
Independent
Escorts When I first reviewed this site it was free. They have
since gone to pay. It's very small, so the poor layout doesn't matter.
Hopefully if they grow they'll change that. The appearance has improved
much since they went to pay to be much classier and crisper. Right
now it's definitely too small to be worth spending any bucks on though.
Male 4 Escorts
New as of May 2003. Initially free but switched to pay in 2006.
Overall a good site though searching can be a bit confusing. Locations
are listed alphatbetically with US states and other countries all
mixed together. What makes it really confusing is Canadian provinces
are listed alphabetically, but 'Canada' is another listing in the
same mix.
Male Gay
Escorts New as of Spring 2004. Site is difficult to review because
it requires an unprecidented action: BOTH escorts and clients must
pay for use of the site! At time of review they have a section,
containing exactly ONE escort to view free escort listings. However
from what is able to be seen this site is not worth the time it
takes to fill out the form, never mind make any payment. It is very
confusing: we spent half an hour on it and still weren't sure of
some navigation points. We found two dead links on major arteries.
And the sites owners aparently were trying to create a new literary
work: there is tons of text everywhere that adds to the confusion.
Things that could be said in three words warrent three paragraphs,
and we are probably among the few people who will ever take the
time to have read them!
Manchester
Lads For Northern England escorts only. Very crisp, clean design
and easy to follow layout. Great for guys who live or visit there,
but that's its fault: very limited geography.
Meet Local
Men Extremely slow to load every page as it is totally graphic
dependent. Rather poor layout--geographically confusing as it's
VERY inconsistent. Caution: several escorts have reported this site
to often be very pushy and sometimes quite rude if disagreed with.
I have been provided with documented information of the owner, Matt,
calling escorts rather nasty names (ironic since he's trying to
make a buck off of us), and he is renowned for auto-rebilling credit
cards. It takes perseverance and a lot of work with your credit
card provider to get the charges reversed because he will not do
so willingly. With the ton of negative emails I've been forwarded
written either by Matt to escorts or about him this is one I definitely
recommend: STAY AWAY, for goodness sake!
Men 4 Rent
Now Started in autumn 2002, this site grew quickly, largely
to a relatively good design and persistent emailing to escorts.
Their odd method was to send promotion as if from another escort
at an AOL email address that wouldn't accept reply. Several escorts
have complained about this tactic. Autumn 2003 they became a pay
site, having build their base with all-free listings.
The one very noticeable flaw in this very good site is their geography:
there's no logic to the layout of countries: it goes US, Canada,
UK, Scotland (even though it is part of the UK!), Australia . .
. As the site continues to grow this flaw could become problematic.
But aside from that it is a good, quick loading site. Provides categories
for escorts, masseurs, porn stars, dancers, etc. Fantastic utility
to sign up for your listing. Also a word of caution: read their
fine print: when you upload your photos to their site you are granting
them full rights to use your pictures in any way they want, including
selling them to other web sites, etc!
Oz Gay Requires
membership to access--and it is NOT cheap! Thus, I haven't even been
in to view it.
Rent Boy Has
been one of the most popular pay-listing sites, though they experience
a lot of problems with keeping their clients actually listed which
is having some effect on their reputation among paying escorts. Some
escorts report nothing but great service, others report problems in
keeping listed and problems with customer service when reporting the
problem. You decide!
That Mall
Lists mostly females. Designed for Southern California, but is spreading.
Very poor layout--just one big long page. Has escorts and masseurs.
Site is quite small. Will definitely require changing format for
it to grow. Can not recommend--a lot of free sites are FAR better
designed to make them more user-friendly.
|
|
|
|
|
|